MR

Meet Marcus Rivera

Solo private investigator · Fort Lauderdale, FL · 6 years in business · former Broward Sheriff's Office

8-10 active cases 1 part-time field investigator Insurance defense + litigation support Hourly + expenses billing

Marcus's Tuesday morning, right now

Before SproutDock — and what changes after.

Before With SproutDock
Surveillance photos and video scattered across phones, SD cards, and hard drives
Opens his dashboard — every active case has a clear status, every deadline is visible
Billable hours and mileage tracked in a spreadsheet — when he remembers to log them
Every email from a defense attorney threads under the right case automatically
Defense attorneys emailing for status updates across three different cases at once
Every photo, video, and file is timestamped, attributed, and chain-of-custody logged on upload
Chain of custody documented in handwritten notes that may or may not hold up at trial
Surveillance windows, court dates, and report deadlines all on one calendar
Engagement letters drafted in Word, printed, signed, scanned, and refiled
Engagement letters sent and signed digitally — executed copy locked in the case file before the call's over
Invoices sent as PDFs — no idea when they were opened, no clean record of what got paid when
Invoicing with open tracking — Marcus knows who owes what and how long it's been

SproutDock speaks Marcus's language

He doesn't have "Jobs" — he has Cases. Custom terminology is built in, set once during onboarding.

Default term →
Marcus's term
Jobs
Cases
Sub-jobs
Aspects (pre-surveillance research, surveillance days, report drafting, trial prep)
Tasks
Activities (records pulls, interviews, field work)
Contracts
Engagement Letters
Files
Evidence (photos, video, witness statements, records)
Products
Services (surveillance, background checks, records retrieval, process serving)
Equipment
Equipment (vehicles, cameras, GPS units, recording gear)

A new case, start to finish

Walk through how Marcus's whole workflow runs through SproutDock. Each stage shows whether the feature is live today, coming soon, or on the roadmap.

An insurance defense attorney calls Marcus about a workers' comp claimant who's reportedly more active than his disability claim would suggest. Marcus creates the law firm as a Client and opens a Case under that client, with the subject's name and the matter type recorded on the case.

He applies his "New Client Matter" workflow — the first step is the engagement letter. He sends it straight from the case. The attorney gets a branded email with a link, reviews the terms (retainer + hourly + expenses), digitally signs. The executed engagement letter is locked, timestamped, and archived under the case before the call's even over.

Concrete example: Karen at Goldberg & Associates calls Marcus at 10:15 AM about a workers' comp surveillance assignment. By 10:45, the case is open, the engagement letter is signed, the retainer payment link has been sent. Marcus is now free to actually start working the case instead of chasing paperwork.
Considerations: PI engagements often die in the gap between the phone call and the signed engagement letter. By the time paperwork's done, the surveillance window has shrunk. Closing that gap to minutes means Marcus is in the field while others are still drafting.
Client + case creation: LIVE E-signature engagement letters: LIVE

Investigations have phases, and good investigators bill them separately. Marcus breaks the case into Aspects: Pre-surveillance research, Surveillance Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Report drafting, Trial prep.

Each Aspect holds its own tasks, files, photos, and deliverables, and can carry its own invoice — so each phase bills on its own line instead of one lump sum. Marcus can pull up "Surveillance Day 2" in isolation to see only that day's work, or open the parent case for the full picture — aggregated invoicing, task completion, and a financial health breakdown across every Aspect.

Concrete example: Goldberg asks Marcus how things stand across the investigation. Marcus opens the parent case — the health sidebar shows total invoiced, total paid, and what's outstanding, broken down by Aspect. No spreadsheet, no mental math. One screen.
Considerations: PI work isn't one continuous effort — it's distinct phases that bill differently and use different resources. Splitting the case into Aspects matches how the work actually flows and makes the billing defensible when an attorney asks for detail.
Cases + Aspects: LIVE

PI work runs on hard windows. Surveillance has to happen before the subject knows they're being watched. Reports have to land before trial. Subpoena responses are due on specific dates.

Marcus puts each one on the case — field days as scheduled work, report and filing deadlines as dated tasks. Everything surfaces on the unified calendar alongside every other open case. Drag any item to a new date to reschedule, and the audit trail logs who moved it and when.

Concrete example: The Smith case trial is December 14. Final report due to defense counsel by November 30. Surveillance window: any time before November 1.Marcus blocks his field days on the calendar and creates tasks with due dates for each — one view across the entire caseload, nothing falls through.
Considerations: PI work runs on hard windows that don't move. Miss the surveillance opportunity and you don't get a do-over. Miss the report deadline and the attorney has nothing to take to trial. The calendar is the safety net for a single-investigator operation.
Case deadlines and tasks: LIVE Unified cross-case calendar: LIVE

Marcus sends emails to defense counsel directly from inside the case. With a custom domain configured, it sends from his agency's own address — looks completely native on the attorney's end. When she replies from her Outlook, the reply automatically threads back under that case, attachments included.

No more digging through a personal inbox for "what did Karen ask me about the Smith case last week?" Every email sent or received through the case lives next to the evidence, the tasks, and the billing record — searchable, threaded, and timestamped.

Concrete example: Marcus sends Karen a preliminary findings summary from inside the Smith case. Karen replies with follow-up questions and attaches the carrier's coverage spreadsheet. Both the reply and the attachment land in the case file automatically — threaded under the original conversation, searchable, never lost in inbox archaeology.
Considerations: Every minute Marcus spends digging through his inbox for the Smith case thread is a minute he's not working on another case. When all case communication lives in one place, he responds faster, looks more organized to his clients, and keeps his field time protected. That's how a solo PI competes with bigger agencies.
Email send + receive threading: LIVE

This is where PIs live or die: defensible evidence. Marcus uploads his surveillance photos and field notes directly into the case. Each upload is attributed to the user who uploaded it, timestamped, and logged in the case audit trail — a documented chain of custody from field to file.

Files can be marked admin-only (Marcus's working notes), client-visible (Karen sees them when shared), or public. For delivering evidence to counsel, Marcus generates a token-shared gallery link — the attorney opens it to view and download photos without needing a login or a giant email attachment.

Concrete example: After three days of surveillance, Marcus has photos showing the claimant lifting a kayak onto a roof rack. He uploads them to the case, each one attributed and audit-logged. When the attorney needs the evidence for trial, Marcus sends a shared gallery link — Karen opens it, views the photos, and downloads what she needs.
Considerations: A PI's reputation lives in the courtroom. Surveillance photos with sloppy chain of custody get excluded; reports without documented evidence handling get torn apart on cross. The automatic audit trail isn't a nice-to-have — it's what makes the work defensible.
File uploads + timestamp audit: LIVE Photo galleries with token sharing: LIVE Visibility controls (admin / client / public): LIVE

PI invoicing has more line items than most service businesses — investigation time, mileage, database lookup fees, equipment costs, per-record charges. Marcus builds these as line items on the invoice, attached to the case or to the specific Aspect so the billing detail matches the work breakdown. To save retyping, he can start from a saved invoice template for the line items he uses every month.

He reviews, edits, and sends. The invoice reaches the firm by email, and Marcus sees when it's opened, how many times, and — once he records the payment — when it was paid.

Concrete example: Marcus's January invoices go out on the 1st. By the 5th he can see which firms have opened them. By the 15th he's recorded Goldberg's payment on day 8 (typical for them), while a second firm hasn't even opened the email — worth a friendly nudge before it ages past 30 days.
Considerations: PI invoices die from two cuts: forgotten line items and slow follow-up. Having open tracking means Marcus knows the difference between "they haven't paid" and "they haven't even looked at it" — two very different conversations.
Invoicing: LIVE Open / read tracking: LIVE Card payment processing: LIVE

Coming soon: a client portal will give each attorney their own login to check case status, interim reports, and invoices on their own schedule — replacing the "what's going on with Smith?" call with a thirty-second self-serve check.

Today, Marcus already keeps the firm in the loop without phone tag: invoices reach them by email (and he sees when they're opened), contracts are signed by link, and photo sets are shared by gallery link — no login required.

Concrete example: Karen at Goldberg needs the surveillance photos from the Smith case for a motion filing. Marcus generates a gallery share link from the case and sends it. Karen opens the link, views the photos, downloads what she needs — no email attachments, no login, no waiting for Marcus to be available.
Considerations: The defense attorneys Marcus works with are juggling dozens of cases at once. Self-serve access means they get answers on their schedule — and Marcus keeps his field time uninterrupted.
Client portal: LIVE Token-shared gallery links: LIVE

On the roadmap: AI integrations that put Marcus's data to work — analyzing email tone and client sentiment, spotting patterns like late-paying firms or cases going stale, flagging approaching deadlines before they sneak up, and surfacing insights across the caseload that would take hours to piece together manually.

The data is already in the system — case activity, email threads, invoice history, task completion. AI will connect the dots and surface what matters, so Marcus spends less time reviewing and more time in the field.

Considerations: Solo PIs don't have a project manager. They have themselves, usually late at night, trying to reconstruct what's slipping. The information needed to spot trouble is already captured — it just needs something reading it. That's the goal.
AI Sunday briefing: COMING SOON

Marcus's Tuesday morning — after

Same day. Same caseload. Different reality.

8:30 AM — opens SproutDock

8:32 AM
Reviews the week's open cases — sees the Jenkins surveillance window closes Wednesday, blocks a field day.
8:45 AM
Pulls up the Smith case to draft preliminary report — 47 photos and 90 minutes of video are already organized and timestamped, nothing to dig for.
9:30 AM
Defense attorney emails a question on a different case — the email threads under that case, Marcus answers, moves on.
10:15 AM
Karen at Goldberg calls about a new assignment. Marcus opens the case and sends the engagement letter while still on the phone.
11:30 AM
Reviews open invoices — sees three are paid, one is approaching 30 days. Sends a friendly check-in.
12:30 PM
Heads out for an afternoon surveillance window. His investigations are organized; he can actually focus on the investigations.
The compounding effect

Marcus's billable hours go up because his admin hours go down. Defense firms refer him to other defense firms because his case files are tighter, his reports are more defensible, and his communication is faster. The reputation compounds — and in PI work, reputation among attorneys is the entire game.

SproutDock isn't just for investigators.

Same architecture, different vocabulary, different workflow emphasis. Custom terminology, layout presets, and module gating let every kind of service business feel native.

Attorneys Roofing contractors Landscapers Property managers Pool service Photographers Consultants Health & wellness